Our Work

Figure 13 Thyene yuxiensis Xie & Peng, 1995, holotype male. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Ditto, ventral view; C. Ditto, anterior view; D–F. Chelicera; D. Posterior view; E. Anterior view; F. Latera…

Figure 13 Thyene yuxiensis Xie & Peng, 1995, holotype male. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Ditto, ventral view; C. Ditto, anterior view; D–F. Chelicera; D. Posterior view; E. Anterior view; F. Lateral view; G. Original label.

Figure 12 Thyene orientalis Żabka, 1985, holotype female of Thyene zhangi, genitalia. A. Epigyne, ventral view; B. Vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CD, copulatory duct; CO, copulatory opening; FD, f…

Figure 12 Thyene orientalis Żabka, 1985, holotype female of Thyene zhangi, genitalia. A. Epigyne, ventral view; B. Vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CD, copulatory duct; CO, copulatory opening; FD, fertilization duct; P, epigynal pocket; S, spermatheca.

Figure 11 Thyene orientalis Żabka, 1985, holotype female of Thyene zhangi. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Ditto, ventral view; C. Ditto, anterior view; D. Chelicerae, posterior view; E. Original label.

Figure 10 Thyene orientalis Żabka, 1985, holotype male of Thyene radialis, palp. A. Palp, ventral view; B. Ditto, dorsal view; C. Ditto, prolateral view; D. Ditto, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: E,…

Figure 10 Thyene orientalis Żabka, 1985, holotype male of Thyene radialis, palp. A. Palp, ventral view; B. Ditto, dorsal view; C. Ditto, prolateral view; D. Ditto, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: E, embolus; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; TF, tegular flap.

Figure 1 Epeus bicuspidatus (Song, Gu & Chen, 1988), holotype female of Telamonia luxiensis. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Ditto, ventral view; C. Ditto, anterior view; D. Chelicera, posterior view;…

Figure 1 Epeus bicuspidatus (Song, Gu & Chen, 1988), holotype female of Telamonia luxiensis. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Ditto, ventral view; C. Ditto, anterior view; D. Chelicera, posterior view; E. Original label.

Figure 3 Taxonomic classification success. (A) Fungal ITS with UNITE (Abarenkov et al. 2023); (B) plant ITS2 with BOLD (Jones et al. 2021); (C) rbcL with BOLD (Jones et al. 2021). The max. possible fo…

Figure 3 Taxonomic classification success. (A) Fungal ITS with UNITE (Abarenkov et al. 2023); (B) plant ITS2 with BOLD (Jones et al. 2021); (C) rbcL with BOLD (Jones et al. 2021). The max. possible for each bar in the plot is based on the number of successful consensus sequences: 1,985 for ITS, 2,209 for ITS2 and 1,952 for rbcL. Default percentage identity thresholds were used: Kingdom: > 80%, Phylum: > 80%, Class: > 80%, Order: > 85%, Family: > 90%, Genus: > 94%, Species: > 97%.

Figure 2 Post-filtering sequence statistics for test samples (full ITS for fungi, ITS2 and rbcL for plants). These samples span a range of qualities and lengths and include many of the variants that m…

Figure 2 Post-filtering sequence statistics for test samples (full ITS for fungi, ITS2 and rbcL for plants). These samples span a range of qualities and lengths and include many of the variants that may appear in chromatograms, such as high quality suddenly dropping due to an indel in the sample and samples whose sequencing failed.

Dataset containing data about the Title Index of Swiss agents representing United Kingdom firms / British Chamber of Commerce for Switzerland (1951). The original focument is on e-manuscripta (https:/…

Dataset containing data about the Title Index of Swiss agents representing United Kingdom firms / British Chamber of Commerce for Switzerland (1951). The original focument is on e-manuscripta (https://doi.org/10.7891/e-manuscripta-174832) This dataset contains Page.XML (=Transkribus export data) Parsed JSON data (=data of project-specific parser, built to extract named entities) Resulting JSON data (=proper data files with authentication data) List of consolidated companies   The resulting data contains: Information about companies and people (actors) listed in the trade index The parser recognizes company and person's names, locations, traded goods,section Found company (see list of consolidated companies) Found locations and their geo-info (geonames id, label, lat, lng, country, region) Found goods and their info (WZ 2008 and ISIC Rev04) Section where the actor is listed (WZ 2008 and ISIC Rev04) Source metadata and IIIF Snippet data   This data has been created and published as part of the dissertation project 'Lessons to learn? Unfolding a Global Market in Difficult Times'; The British Chamber of Commerce for Switzerland 1920 – 1950 (https://data.snf.ch/grants/grant/211961)

Figure 1 Pipeline step diagram. Each major component can be fine-tuned with command line options. RAW SEQUENCING FILES (chromatograms) are used for CONSENSUS BUILDING where they are filtered, aligned …

Figure 1 Pipeline step diagram. Each major component can be fine-tuned with command line options. RAW SEQUENCING FILES (chromatograms) are used for CONSENSUS BUILDING where they are filtered, aligned and converted into a consensus, based on either one of or both forward and reverse sequencing reads. Failure to generate a consensus results in discarding the sample, as the sequence quality is too low. Consensus sequences are then passed to the CLASSIFICATION module where they are BLASTed against the specified database and the BLAST hits are filtered to assign the sample a taxonomic identity. All samples that did not achieve a species-level taxonomic classification undergo a series of QUALITY CHECKS for length, sequence quality and (if the target region includes ITS) the presence of the motifs flanking the ITS region. Samples passing these strict quality checks are sent for CLUSTERING into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). Samples failing the quality checks are directed to SALVAGING where they are BLASTed against a custom database that includes both the reference sequences linked to the samples with species-level assignments and the cluster centroids of the OTUs. All fungal samples that either: (1) have a species-level classification; (2) were clustered into OTUs or (3) were successfully salvaged, can optionally undergo FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION with FUNGuild (Nguyen et al. 2016).